View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0000239LDMudEfunspublic2004-12-13 09:49
ReporterlarsAssigned To 
PrioritynormalSeverityfeatureReproducibilityN/A
Status newResolutionopen 
Summary0000239: Path finding algorithms
DescriptionShort: LDMUD - Driver - Idea: Short(est) Path Algorithms
From: Andy <Andreas.Klauer@epost.de>
To: lars@bearnip.com
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 23:11:03 +0100
Type: Feature
State: New

Hi Lars,

for a long time, finding a short(est) path from one point to another was a
great problem for many computer games. Today it isn't a problem anymore for
games, since fast and efficient algorithms for almost every situation can be
found on the net, and newer machines are fast enough to compute those paths in
real-time.

In MUDs, finding a short(est) path is still a great problem, but it becomes (at
least I think so) more and more important, because players want to have more
intelligent NPCs, Monsters that follow and hunt players, NPCs in towns who
arent always in the same room... and also special units, like horses who follow
a road by themselves, or ships which connect different continents.

Some wizards in UNItopia had these problems and tried to do these shortest path
algorithms in LPC. It works, but its very slow... some load all rooms and make
a database of all exits of the rooms once, which takes loads of RAM... others
load and check rooms in runtime, thats very slow.

Other problems, like the ships, can't be solved at all... in UNItopia, the
ships make large 'hops' (because its not the best thing to load 1000 rooms for
every player who wants to drive 1000 sea-miles with his ship...). But that has
the effect, that on some places players can 'hop' with their ships over land.

LPC is just not fast enough to make a really efficient short(est) path
algorithm... additionally, in LPC you normally have (as long as you don't have
a master which saves a whole database...) to load a whole room first before you
can see wether a unit (ship, for example) can enter the room or not.

So, my idea was, that it could be possible to implement a short(est) path
routine into the driver. Because most muds use the standard 8 directions:
north, west, south, east, northeast, ..., and most of the time there are
just 2 cases: something can move there oder not, something like a 2dimensional
bitmatrix would be a great thing, and useable in most muds for most of these
problems.

A map of a town could then look like the following:
00000000000000000000000
00001001001000000000000
00011111111000010000000
00000000001111110000000
01000000110000011111111
01010001100010010000000 (the 1 are the positions where players can walk on...)
11111111100011110000000
00010001000010010000000
00010001110000011111111
00000001000000000000000
00000001000000000000000

Or, for an island a ship cant drive on, it could look like this:
00001000000000000000000
00111001100000100000000
00011111110000111110000
00000011110101111111000
00000001111111111100000
00011111111111111111000 (the 1 are land mass where ships can't drive on)
01111111110000000000000
00011111111111000000000
00000011111100000000000
00000000001111110000000
00000000000011110000000

In UNItopia, such continents are up to 1000*1000 fields large (which would make
it somewhat inefficient to save it in another format than bits...)

As you may already have noticed, I'm not an Informatician at all. I don't know
how fast something like this would be if it was implemented in the driver (and
some new bitmatrixlike-datatype for LPC), or if something like that can be
implemented in the driver at all. It's just one of my crazy ideas...

With such a matrix, there could be functions which cut out submatrixes of a
large matrix, a line function that tells if on a line from (x1|y1) to (x2|y2)
are just 0's or just 1's or some 0's and 1's, and of course a short(est) path
from point A to B, or from point A to a border of the matrix, or something
similar... in this function one should be able to specify which of the 8
directions are possible, if 0's or 1's can be walked on and so on...

So, thats my idea. Something that may be possible and may be useful for many
muds.

You know the driver - of course - much better than I do. And certainly you know
muds better than I do. And you are a much better programmer than I am.

What do you think - is there a possibility to implement something like this?

Greetings,

Menaures@UNItopia (I'm not an admin, just a little wizard who doesn't know
much 'bout all this stuff;)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:54:29 -0700
From: Acius <helpsfamily@home.com>

Yeah I like this idea. Path finding on a 2d grid is good, My only
suggestion would be to use 1 byte per cell (0 = no passage, any other
number = cost) so that you can have variable-cost maps (allows NPC's to
favor roads over dark and dangerous forests, for example). For more info
on that, look up A-star (A*), which is probably the best algorithm for
this kind of problem.

A-star info, and pathfinding in general can be found at:
http://theory.stanford.edu/~amitp/GameProgramming/

As for arbitrary n-dimensional maps, it's a different problem --
basically a more general version of the 2d plane problem, and with no
cheap way to find out if you are closer or further from your
destination. Since rooms on most MUDs are usually implemented as
connected graphs with an arbitrary number of exits which can connect to
anywhere, solving the problem by modelling the rooms as a connected
graph is useful.

The main problem is that the driver has to be "exit-aware". So far,
exits are implemented at the MUDlib level, and the driver doesn't know
about them. Because the driver needs to know exits for lots of rooms all
at once, and because pathfinding may be used often, it is not efficient
to query exits from the rooms each time you try to find a path. It is
better, I believe, if the rooms proactively tell the driver what their
exits are in advance with a call to an efun (set_exit_connections,
perhaps) which passes an array of objects and/or filenames to the
driver, so it can trace from room to room. This would be stored with a
pointer in the object structure probably.

Here is some quick pseudocode on how a pathfinder might work:

Queue q;
           // A queue of nodes we have visited and which
           // we need to recurse outward from.
Object curr; // The current node we're focusing on.
Mapping visited;
           // Tracks nodes you've visited; also provides
           // a backward trace so you can figure out the
           // path when you're done.

QueuePush( q, starting_room );
visited = EMPTY_MAPPING;
MappingAdd( visited, starting_room, NULL );
while( !q.empty() ) {
    curr = QueuePop( q );
    if( curr = destination ) break;
    for (Loop "i" through each exit attached to curr)
    if( !MappingMember(visited, curr.exit[i]) ) {
       QueuePush( q, curr.exit[i] );
       MappingAdd(visited, curr.exit[i], curr);
    }
}

if( curr == destination ) {
    // Figure out the path by tracing it backward through
    // the mapping we made.
}

This algorithm is a breadth-first search. So it examines all rooms that
are one exit away, then all rooms that are two exits away, then three
exits, etc. It keeps doing this until it finds the final room. Each room
remembers the room before it in the recursion, so you can trace a path
backward. I think of this like an "expanding balloon" of rooms starting
at the beginning place, and stopping when the balloon reaches the
destination.

Another good technique is to make TWO expanding balloons, one from the
starting point and one from the destination point. You accomplish this
by putting both the starting and ending points on the queue. As soon as
one of them runs into a node from the other balloon, you trace paths
backwards through both and connect them together for the final path.
This is much harder to code, but would probably be more efficient (maybe
2-4x as fast?). The trick is testing for intersection between the
"balloons", probably with a special mapping again.

That's all I have. It's late, so I apologize for any incoherency or
oversights. Best of luck to Lars with this feature, I'm hoping to use it
already :).

-- Acius (Adam Helps)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:58:00 +0100 (MET)
From: Fini <ujastrow@hasyl04.desy.de>
To: amylaar-users@nightfall.org
Subject: Re: [amylaar-users]: Fwd: Idea: Short(est) Path Algorithms


> A map of a town could then look like the following:
> 00000000000000000000000
> 00001001001000000000000
Somewhere you need to assign pathnames to the 0s and 1s. Thats the
same problem you have in LPC. We have some differend path machines
running in our mud - speed is ok (but we aren't as large as unitopia)
but what really bothers is the memory usage for all those pathnames.
The speed to find the shortest path (with one of the well known algos)
is no problem here (for distances of maybe 100 rooms).

If you just implement 2d or 3d bitmaps and some path algorithm I cannot
see any improvement on lpc solutions.

And to be frank - I think there are more important things to do that
this ;o)



  Fiona @ Wunderland


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:35:58 +0100 (MET)
From: Fini <ujastrow@hasyl04.desy.de>
To: acius@bigfoot.com
Cc: amylaar-users@nightfall.org
Subject: Re: [amylaar-users]: Re: Short(est) Path Algorithms

> This algorithm is a breadth-first search. So it examines all rooms that
> are one exit away, then all rooms that are two exits away, then three
> exits, etc.
> [...] an "expanding balloon"

In my experiance rooms in muds are not that much connected, you have some
paths with no extra exits at all for 5 rooms and so on. So this very
basic approach is really slow compared to more intelligent algos which
take the room graph into account - means having nodes and interconnecting
bows.

While the baloon-method needs different and more and more time heres a
snippet of http://ciips.ee.uwa.edu.au/~morris/Year2/PLDS210/dijkstra.html
(just the first I found an yahoo with 'djikstra' as search keyword).

> Djikstra's algorithm (named after its discover, E.W. Dijkstra) solves
> the problem of finding the shortest path from a point in a graph
> (the source) to a destination. It turns out that one can find the
> shortest paths from a given source to all points in a graph in the
> same time, hence this problem is sometimes called the single-source
> shortest paths problem.
>
> The somewhat unexpected result that all the paths can be found as
> easily as one further demonstrates the value of reading the literature
> on algorithms!

The last sentence is the most important :*)


   Fiona @ Wunderland


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:31:25 +0100 (MET)
From: Fini <ujastrow@hasyl04.desy.de>
To: acius@bigfoot.com
Subject: Re: [amylaar-users]: Re: Short(est) Path Algorithms

Hi!

> The "balloon" algorithm I described does not mean a balloon-shaped object
I know your algo well enough ;o) its normally the first approch to that
kind of problem.

> compute per node, however it does handle edge cost (the method I gave
> assumes all edges are the same cost).
No problem to introduce edge cost in your algo, is it ;o)

> in O(n) time [...]
Btw complexity of the balloon in light graphs should be O((E+V)log V) ;o)

> Yes, very true, but be careful that you understand my algorithm before
> picking it apart. It is the same order of time.
There are some different algorithms for different types of typical or
expected data. Choosing the right algorithm for the given situation is
the problem - not the implementation of some well known algorithm.

I dont pick your balloon apart, I just state that there is another algo
which performes better with the given data (at least in our mud and our
typical interconnections of rooms). No offence intended.

Fini

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 10:37:54 +0100 (MET)
From: Jacob 'Ugh' Wieland <ughosage@cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: acius@bigfoot.com
Cc: amylaar-users@nightfall.org
Subject: Re: [amylaar-users]: Re: Short(est) Path Algorithms

Maybe the problem should be approached from
the same angle as in reality (where the same problem exists).

There, the 'world' is organized hierarchically into 'regions'
(graphically speaking kinds of 'strongly connected components')
for which there exist
 - local maps (connecting actual locations),
 - country-maps (connecting the cities),
 - continent-maps (connecting the countries) and
 - world-maps (connecting the continents).

Each node needs some connection-points for the next-higher level
(city exits, borders-stations/mountain-passes, ports).

Thus, the complexity of the path-finding-problem to be solved
depends on the 'locality' of the source and destination (and possible
means of travel, of course :-)) meaning which hierarchical
boundaries have to be traversed.

Normally, the amount of actual nodes in each graph isn't that
high and the path-density decreases with each level. Thus, it
should neither be a problem to either compute the local
connections at runtime or once and for all for a database which
shouldn't be so large, either.

Thus, you (pre-)compute only the connections between nodes of the
same hierarchy and compute the global path from these by finding
the paths to the different connection points from the lower
and the higher hierarchy.

If you want to find the routes from a tavern in one city to a tavern in a
city on another continent
- look for paths to exits of that city
- look for paths from exits of that city to exits of the country of the city
- look for paths from exits of the country to exits of the continent of the country
- look for paths from exits of the continent to entries of the continent of
  the country of the other city
- look for paths from entries of the target-continent to entries of
  the target-country
- look for paths from entries of the target-country to entries of the
  target-city
- look for paths from entries of the target-city to the target tavern
--> compute the different routes (shortest paths or whatever) on this
    probably very small subgraph (you can rule out unacceptable paths
    - too long, too expensive, wrong means of travel, etc. - on each level
    to cut down the complexity of the overall problem)

For shortest/all paths (and related) problems, the Floyd-Warshall-Algorithm
has a good complexity (though not the best).

for all bridge(s) in nodes
  for all start(s) in nodes
    if there are paths from start to bridge
      for all goal(s) in nodes
        if there are paths from bridge to goal
          connect the paths from start to bridge with the paths from
          brige to goal and add them to the paths from start to goal

Ugh, the Lib Orang-Utan of TubMud

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:59:18 -0700
From: Acius <helpsfamily@home.com>

Oops, sorry to send this to Jacob twice. I meant to post it to the
mailing list the first time.

Jacob 'Ugh' Wieland wrote:
 > Maybe the problem should be approached from
 > the same angle as in reality (where the same problem exists).
 >
 > There, the 'world' is organized hierarchically into 'regions'
 > (graphically speaking kinds of 'strongly connected components')
 > for which there exist
 > - local maps (connecting actual locations),
 > - country-maps (connecting the cities),
 > - continent-maps (connecting the countries) and
 > - world-maps (connecting the continents).
 >
 > Each node needs some connection-points for the next-higher level
 > (city exits, borders-stations/mountain-passes, ports).

<snip>

Yes, this is a good idea. The method I gave (where each room reports its
exits) can work for this problem, if you make an object for each area,
an object for each country, an object for each continent, etc. You would
implement it like this:

Rooms only report connections to other rooms in their area.

The area stores which rooms are connected to other areas, and reports
connections to other areas (as if they were rooms).

The country stores which areas have connections to other countries,
and reports its connections to other countries.

... same goes for countries connected on continents, and continents
connected on the world. There might be some interesting messing around
when you hit oceans, but the same principle can be used.

Then, at the MUDlib level when you want to find a path, you would
start by querying the path between the two continents, then between
the areas and the edges of the continent where they are connected,
then between the rooms connecting each area object (these can be
cached), and also the rooms in the endpoint area objects. You can do
this all in the MUDlib without extra driver support.

Also, Fiona points out that Dijkstra gives a better solution to path
finding if you have edge costs. Since edge costs are very useful (they
help persuade NPC's to stick to roads, etc.) it is probably better to do
it this way. Perhaps you can do it this way:

set_connections( borders, costs );

Where borders is an array of objects, and costs is an array of integers.
The two arrays would be in parallel. If an array of costs is not
included, you can assume ({ 1, 1, 1, ... }) to match the number of borders.

-- Acius

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:49:58 +0800
From: Trevor Phillips <phillips@central.murdoch.edu.au>

Eeek! Have I ignored/missed interesting discussion on this list? Or has it been
on some other list I'm not on??

I dabbled with path finding years ago (assuming we're talking the auto-routing
from one room to another room, useful for Monster navigation, etc...), and had
a working model, but it was computationally intensive such that on the server
at the time it'd give "too long eval" too often to be practical.

Rooms is probably the most developed std object on our Mud, with rooms having
dimensions (rough NS/EW/Height), as well as properties like indoors/outdoors,
etc... The dimensions allowed an auto-mapper to fairly accurately map an area,
keeping in perspective (given that some rooms are tiny, and others are huge),
so it all matched up and actually looked reasonable on an auto-generated ASCII
map. The World Co-ordinates were set at particular rooms, and then coords for
each room were calculated based on the adjacent rooms, and room dimensions.

But, I digress. As I said, path-finding held great interest to me, but was too
slow. I planned to experiment with ERQ and an external process for calculating
the routes in a non-realtime manner. eg; Each room's properties are logged to a
MySQL table, and an external program uses the data to calculate a possible
shortest route from one room to another. I never got the time to get it up and
going, though...

Anyway, I'm interested in this topic, so'd be most appreciative if you can
forward any info on plans, etc...

Thanks. ^_^

--
. Trevor Phillips - http://jurai.murdoch.edu.au/ .
: CWIS Systems Administrator - T.Phillips@murdoch.edu.au :
| IT Services - Murdoch University |
 >------------------- Member of the #SAS# & #CFC# --------------------<
| On nights such as this, evil deeds are done. And good deeds, of /
| course. But mostly evil, on the whole. /
 \ -- (Terry Pratchett, Wyrd Sisters) /
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

TagsNo tags attached.
External Data (URL)

Activities

menaures

2004-12-12 16:01

reporter   ~0000252

I don't need it anymore. Ships can no longer hop over islands and paths can be calculated from virtually anywhere to anywhere in realtime (as long as a ship can go there, of course). It's the most sophisticated thing I've ever done (and probably will ever do) in LPC.

malc

2004-12-13 05:00

reporter   ~0000253

If you've written something to compute shortest path algorithms, and it does it well...perhaps you could share that with the rest of the community? I'm sure most people either don't spend time on it, or don't have enough skills to make it happen. But either way, calculating paths is very interesting, at least for making more intelligent NPCs (to me).

menaures

2004-12-13 06:44

reporter   ~0000254

I doubt it would be of any use to the community. It's neither generic nor portable, but rather a very complex piece of code that was specially crafted to fit the requirements of UNItopia's ships. It operates on an infinite 2D grid (the sea) with arbitrary shaped obstacles (islands, but no isolated areas) on it. And our ships can move freely on this grid. If you have something in your MUD that resembles this very closely, I'll be happy to share my ideas and, if applicable, code as well. Send a message to the bearnip mailing list or contact me directly.

peng

2004-12-13 09:49

reporter   ~0000255

We have in our lib some support for moving npcs around. They get a target (which itself can be a moving object or a room or an object in an inventory) and do one step after another via call_out. The steps are relatively cheap (just looking in a table for the next command to do), but registering new rooms in the system can be expensive. But thats tolerable since its only done once. We have all the main areas included and the npcs can travel from one end of the galaxy, including using spaceships, teleporters and lifts to the other. It works quite well.
Internally it uses a dijkstra-algorithm.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2004-11-26 23:52 lars New Issue
2004-12-12 16:01 menaures Note Added: 0000252
2004-12-13 05:00 malc Note Added: 0000253
2004-12-13 06:44 menaures Note Added: 0000254
2004-12-13 09:49 peng Note Added: 0000255